The goal is to partition a dense graph into few pseudorandom parts.
Edge density
-regularity: For a pair of vertex sets and is called -regular, if for all subsets satisfying we have
Regular partition: A partition of into sets is called an -regular partition if
A way to achieve such partitions is to take: with
1. This set is called the exceptional set.
2.
3. All but at most of the pairs are -regular.
Szemeredi’s regularity lemma:
For every and positive integer , there are integers such that any graph with at least vertices, there is a in the range and an -regular partition of the vertex set of into sets.
Proof (Energy Increment): Start with an arbitrary partition and if we find irregular subsets between a pair of vertex sets, we refine the partition further.
Consider the “energy” of a partition
A trivial bound on the this function is by noting that
Find a pair of irregular subsets between for each pair . Refining the partition by using these irregular witnesses, we split each vertex set into atmost parts.
The resulting sets may not be of equal size- so we further split the sets into equal size sets and if any parts are left, we add them to the exceptional set.
Now we observe that
1. the energy increases with any refinement.
2. And infact, the above refinements increase the energy by atleast by some fixed amount.
So by the upper bound on the energy, in finite number of iterations, we reach a regular partition.
The fact that it increases can be seen by Cauchy’s inequality and that it increases by some fixed amount in out iterations (by ) can be seen by the defect version of Cauchy Schwarz- (Basically amount to using that is the variance of ; and irregular pairs exactly corresponds to variation from expected value)
Energy Increment under refinements: Let be two disjoint sets. If and are partitions of and respectively, then:
We used Cauchy-Schwarz in the form:
Lower bounds on the increment: Let be two disjoint sets such that is not -regular, for a given then there exists partitions of and respectively such that:
https://www.cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/TOPICS/vdw/notesregularity.pdf
Question: Understand the explicit dependence between the parameters