The goal is to partition a dense graph into few pseudorandom parts.
Edge density
-regularity: For
a pair of vertex sets
and
is called
-regular, if for all subsets
satisfying
we have
Regular partition: A partition of into
sets
is called an
-regular partition if
A way to achieve such partitions is to take: with
1. This set is called the exceptional set.
2.
3. All but at most of the pairs
are
-regular.
Szemeredi’s regularity lemma:
For every and positive integer
, there are integers
such that any graph
with at least
vertices, there is a
in the range
and an
-regular partition of the vertex set of
into
sets.
Proof (Energy Increment): Start with an arbitrary partition and if we find irregular subsets between a pair of vertex sets, we refine the partition further.
Consider the “energy” of a partition
A trivial bound on the this function is by noting that
Find a pair of irregular subsets between for each pair . Refining the partition by using these irregular witnesses, we split each vertex set
into atmost
parts.
The resulting sets may not be of equal size- so we further split the sets into equal size sets and if any parts are left, we add them to the exceptional set.
Now we observe that
1. the energy increases with any refinement.
2. And infact, the above refinements increase the energy by atleast by some fixed amount.
So by the upper bound on the energy, in finite number of iterations, we reach a regular partition.
The fact that it increases can be seen by Cauchy’s inequality and that it increases by some fixed amount in out iterations (by ) can be seen by the defect version of Cauchy Schwarz- (Basically amount to using that
is the variance of
; and irregular pairs exactly corresponds to variation from expected value)
Energy Increment under refinements: Let be two disjoint sets. If
and
are partitions of
and
respectively, then:
We used Cauchy-Schwarz in the form:
Lower bounds on the increment: Let be two disjoint sets such that
is not
-regular, for a given
then there exists partitions
of
and
respectively such that:
https://www.cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/TOPICS/vdw/notesregularity.pdf
Question: Understand the explicit dependence between the parameters